• Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?

    Go here:

    Edit Account Details and Profile

Road to 350: What Does the US Navy Do Anyway?

Uncle Fester

Robot Pimp
None
Super Moderator
Contributor
Would a fundamental switch to shorter, more frequent cruises by CVNs — as SECDEF suggests in that article Randy Daytona posted — be better, worse, or the same in terms of stress on that power plant?
Plant stress is the least of the reasons for this proposal.

The problem with the 90-day cruise idea is that you give up a lot in exchange for not much savings. You need the same amount of workups whether you deploy for three months or ten. Workups stress the strike group, ships, and Air Wing - that’s kind of the point - and they cost a lot of money. And then, assuming you’re going to CENTCOM, of that 90-day deployment, you’re going to spend anywhere from two to five weeks in transit.

Ship/CAG readiness isn’t shelf-stable. You have to work up to full readiness to deploy, and then you have to maintain that readiness. That takes flight time and underway time, which cost the same whether you’re over Syria or fooling around off VaCapes. And you can only do that for so long; at some point you run out of flight hours, airplanes start breaking, ships need to go into the yards, that guy in your AT shop you can’t deploy without is due to PCS and you have to send one or two guys to school to replace him, etc etc etc. Sort of like revving up your engine at the start line of a drag race, and then having the car sit there at full rev indefinitely.

Not to mention, it stresses and frustrates your guys and their families when they don’t deploy. When you’re fully worked up, you’re ready to go do the job. And as much as cruise sucks for the families, sitting around for months with a “might go any minute, might not” plan is more stressful. That’s not theory; it’s exactly what happened a few years ago to the Truman CSG when they worked up and then stayed clamped to the pier.
 

Flash

SEVAL/ECMO
None
Super Moderator
Contributor
I know he’s in a different job now, but Mattis was one of the most insatiable COCOMs when it came to carrier presence in his AOR. I put this in the interesting idea, but not executable column.
That wasn't the only thing CENTCOM was insatiable for, the list of stuff they wanted at one point was absurd (and perversely was kind of the point of the request).
 

HH-60H

Manager
pilot
Super Moderator
Contributor
It's crack for a lot of folks, especially FMV. And if you don't have it then things just can't get done!
It's weird... as SECDEF he seems to be taking a more conservative approach to ISR, really looking at the risk versus reward.
 

Flash

SEVAL/ECMO
None
Super Moderator
Contributor
It's weird... as SECDEF he seems to be taking a more conservative approach to ISR, really looking at the risk versus reward.
He is at the other end of the long pole now and has much more responsibility. I would also argue that his conservative approach isn't exactly helpful from my perspective, but that is more for another forum.
 

HH-60H

Manager
pilot
Super Moderator
Contributor
He is at the other end of the long pole now and has much more responsibility. I would also argue that his conservative approach isn't exactly helpful from my perspective, but that is more for another forum.
That's good point. I guess you really do "stand where you sit."
 
Top