• Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?

    Go here:

    Edit Account Details and Profile

Professional Reading Drop Box

squorch2

he will die without safety brief
pilot
More enticement to read Diffusion of Military Power: there's an entire chapter on carrier warfare, and another on "battlefleet warfare."

Tables like the one below aren't everywhere, but this one is representative of the rigor of the research and writing.
stats.jpg
 

BigRed389

Registered User
None
Also a now over-referenced book among the GOFO crowd.

That is a little scary.

Because it either means:
A) They actually read it and thought it was a good book
or
B) They didn't read it and are just jumping on the Beltway bookmobile bandwagon for this book.

Seriously, if the authors could have condensed the entire novel into a long article length vignette, it would have retained the same amount of expository value on the application of emerging technologies.
 

squorch2

he will die without safety brief
pilot
True, the ultra dense tables aren't great at enticement, but rather speak more to the rigor of the work.
 

nittany03

Recovering NFO. Herder of Programmers.
pilot
None
Super Moderator
Contributor
True, the ultra dense tables aren't great at enticement, but rather speak more to the rigor of the work.
If you can't dazzle 'em with brilliance, baffle 'em with bullshit. "Dyadic satisfaction?" For fuck's sake. I haven't read the book (I guess after this post, I have to), but if it's got sound reasoning, it sure seems like pretty damned pompous sound reasoning.

Anyone who would unironically use a phrase like "dyadic satisfaction" needs a kick to the nuts. Even being an undergrad sophomore humanities major would be an explanation, not a justification.
 

Pags

N/A
pilot
If you can't dazzle 'em with brilliance, baffle 'em with bullshit. "Dyadic satisfaction?" For fuck's sake. I haven't read the book, but if it's got sound reasoning, it's sure seems like pretty damned pompous sound reasoning.

Anyone who would unironically use a phrase like "dyadic satisfaction" needs a kick to the nuts. Even being an undergrad sophomore humanities major would be an explanation, not a justification.
Get over the terminology. It's probably a term that's well defined within the genre. Just because you don't understand it at first glance doesn't mean it isn't backed up by logic.
 

jmcquate

Well-Known Member
Contributor
Get over the terminology. It's probably a term that's well defined within the genre. Just because you don't understand it at first glance doesn't mean it isn't backed up by logic.
Meh....."mutual agreement" would have done just fine.
 

Pags

N/A
pilot
Meh....."mutual agreement" would have done just fine.
Probably would have, but you don't get a PhD or credit in a professional field using layman's terms (odds are you won't make a best seller list either, but that depends on who you want to read your work).
 

jmcquate

Well-Known Member
Contributor
but you don't get a PhD or credit in a professional field using layman's terms
And that's a big problem. On a side note, I don't consider "mutual agreement" as laymen's terms. Just proper English, not ancient Greek.
 

IKE

Nerd Whirler
pilot
But "mutual" can entail more than two parties in agreement. "Dyadic" denotes exactly two parties. I'm of the mind that specificity cannot be undervalued in academic writing.
 

danpass

Well-Known Member
That is a little scary.

Because it either means:
A) They actually read it and thought it was a good book
or
B) They didn't read it and are just jumping on the Beltway bookmobile bandwagon for this book.

Seriously, if the authors could have condensed the entire novel into a long article length vignette, it would have retained the same amount of expository value on the application of emerging technologies.
I wonder if they're using it for the citations.

Because the scenario is too simplistic.
 

danpass

Well-Known Member
Does anyone have a recommendation for a WW1/Great War book concerning the overall history? The cause(s), the war, the aftermath.
 

Gonzo08

*1. Gangbar Off
None
Does anyone have a recommendation for a WW1/Great War book concerning the overall history? The cause(s), the war, the aftermath.

Not sure about books, but if you have any interest in podcasts, there's once called Hardcore History that did a huge WWI series called 'Blueprint for Armageddon". I think it's 5 parts and each is 3 or 4 hours a piece. Super in depth and was free when I listened to it.
 
Top