One thing pilots will always have over UASs...better quotes.Hmmm....think I've heard or read that somewhere before......![]()
One thing pilots will always have over UASs...better quotes.Hmmm....think I've heard or read that somewhere before......![]()
It's ok, man. I still love you.Completely agree. It's tedious and painful to have to listen to people insist that they aren't, and can never be, replaced by increased technology.
How long until camera, sensor, and communications technology is so good that the pilot can be "virtually" in the cockpit to the point where flying the plane remotely is almost indistinguishable from being in the cockpit? I would imagine security of the data and communication links to the UAV would be the major issue?
It's ok, man. I still love you.![]()
I see an opportunity here. I'm startin' my design om a "Full Motion" office chair right now!![]()
A lot of the mission is completely autonomous. It's a lot less dependent on maintaining a link than its predecessors, so if anything, it's susceptibility to EA is going to be less than the current generation of UAVs.Let's see it operate against someone who takes EA seriously and doesn't give a shit about our JRFL. Then we can talk. No, we'll never answer that question here, but just a thought . . .
...and a hell of a lot more likely to go all SkyNet on us.A lot of the mission is completely autonomous. It's a lot less dependent on maintaining a link than its predecessors, so if anything, it's susceptibility to EA is going to be less than the current generation of UAVs.
Edit and my apologies, the tag line for the video says it occurred in Pax. I wasn't aware they had an operable steam catapult there. Our squadron has been operating there with the X-47, and while they have caused some minor inconveniences, it hasn't honestly been too bad.
I agree that the human element will probably never go away, but this does bring a pretty amazing capability to the CSG that I think would be pretty difficult to deny ourselves of. It will be interesting to see these things operate on the flight deck where things are already really dynamic. I just don't think that the technology will mature enough to allow simultaneous ops with manned aircraft. There are just too many variables with respots, spinoffs, suspends, simultaneous launches and recoveries, helo ops, four guys directing different aircraft all in fairly close vicinity of each other, etc.
I definitely can envision a UAV only launch and recovery where nothing else is moving up there.
I guess the good thing is that they won't have to waste a whole day and night getting CQ done at the beginning of cruise, right?
Well.....we do have ICBMs.There was an interesting story I read today about the legal aspects of the autonomous use of deadly force. I have no doubt that we'll be there at some point, but we're not there yet, and the legal framework behind such things haven't matured sufficiently to allow it yet.
Well.....we do have ICBMs.