…then share them?FIFY
…then share them?FIFY
Democrats: Leon Panetta, Susan Rice, Janet Yellen, Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, Robert Reich, Eric Holder...…then share them?
Democrats: Leon Panetta, Susan Rice, Janet Yellen, Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, Robert Reich, Eric Holder...
Republicans: George HW Bush, Rice, Rumsfeld, Cheney, Powell, Ashcroft, Baker, Gates...
It shouldn't intuitively surprise you that people normally work in lower level administration roles before being appointed to cabinet secretary or running for VP.
Trump wanted to get new blood even in his first term and then took it upon himself to purge the GOP after McCain's nay vote re: ACA repeal. It'll be interesting to see if that old guard comes back after Trump's term, especially after they endorsed Harris for president last election cycle.
For all we know, it may have been as simple as someone having pictures of someone else.Mattis’ motives
Nice words. I'll be looking at actions.Word on the street is the new Acting SECNAV is getting off to a good start . . .
How is this in any way indicative of getting off to a good start? Dude gives boilerplate speech to troops that any Navy O6 should be able to do in their sleep with zero prep. Let's see what he can deliver before queueing up to give him a hand job.Word on the street is the new Acting SECNAV is getting off to a good start . . .
Hey, no cutting in line!queueing up to give him a hand job
Great comments here from SECWAR. The most ridiculous comment I heard while on AD was “Mission First, People Always.” Really, people will ALWAYS trump the mission? The DOW is on the right track here . . .
Puzzling that you've somehow managed to interpret the stated prioritization backwards.Great comments here from SECWAR. The most ridiculous comment I heard while on AD was “Mission First, People Always.” Really, people will ALWAYS trump the mission? The DOW is on the right track here . . .
In a world where using the number “86” is apparently a prosecutable offense (go ahead and indict me, DOJ), is it really that surprising?Puzzling that you've somehow managed to interpret the stated prioritization backwards.