Yeah you don’t need luck lol you got it for sureAge: 28
OAR: 63
GPA: 3.3 BS+MS computer science
good luck everyone
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah you don’t need luck lol you got it for sureAge: 28
OAR: 63
GPA: 3.3 BS+MS computer science
good luck everyone
Might be a bit tougher, gl.45 oar
3.06 gpa
Wish me luck
Where are you seeing thatIt's brutal this board has so many strong candidates, I think the average Oar is 6 points higher than past boards and the GPA is 1.29 higher or something.
I just took the averages from what people posted at the last board and compared it to the averages of this board. if you click the Sept tab in the google sheet you can look at the past people's profiles.Where are you seeing that
Past 2 boards they took everyone people with 39 and 40 oar low gpas
The spreadsheet cant be opened
I said 1.29 orginally, but meant .22Where are you seeing that
Past 2 boards they took everyone people with 39 and 40 oar low gpas
The spreadsheet cant be opened
What are the averages for this board where s that infoI just took the averages from what people posted at the last board and compared it to the averages of this board. if you click the Sept tab in the google sheet you can look at the past people's profiles.
for SWO OAR its 59 past is 50 and for GPA its 3.51 and past its 3.31. I changed my original post. If you go to the right hand side it does the calculation for you and you can compare the two.What are the averages for this board where s that info
Whats the mean frequency of the mode. How many applicants have entered their data.for SWO OAR its 59 past is 50 and for GPA its 3.51 and past its 3.31. I changed my original post. If you go to the right hand side it does the calculation for you and you can compare the two.
for SWO OAR its 59 past is 50 and for GPA its 3.51 and past its 3.31. I changed my original post. If you go to the right hand side it does the calculation for you and you can compare the two.
There’s also more information from the “out of date board” that I shared the link to on page 2 of this subgroupI just took the averages from what people posted at the last board and compared it to the averages of this board. if you click the Sept tab in the google sheet you can look at the past people's profiles.
I am just going off the available information man. 11 people from this board and 16 from last. Also I don't think looking at who was accepted at other boards is the way to look at it. I think it's based off who's at the current board and how much of Quote is still open. Each board makes an independent decision. I was just saying the candidate profiles this time around seem stronger than what other people posted at boards before this.Whats the mean frequency of the mode. How many applicants have entered their data.
If it s just like 4 to 5 guys who should ve been isel thats clearly skewing the data
Each board has typically 105 to 120 applications aboutI am just going off the available information man. 11 people from this board and 16 from last. Also I don't think looking at who was accepted at other boards is the way to look at it. I think it's based off who's at the current board and how much of Quote is still open. Each board makes an independent decision. I was just saying the candidate profiles this time around seem stronger than what other people posted at boards before this.
Prior boards of 105 people 103 were selectedEach board has typically 105 to 120 applications about
It could just be an availability bias of the data. Hence the people who put in their data are outliers for this cohort
Or I could just be sol time will tell
To add, the discrepancy might just be from ease of access to the spreadsheet. If you look at most other SWO board posts, the initial post doesn't include a link to the spreadsheet and it gets buried whereas the initial post here includes the spreadsheet + a link to it so its easier for people to see and input their information.Each board has typically 105 to 120 applications about
It could just be an availability bias of the data. Hence the people who put in their data are outliers for this cohort
Or I could just be sol time will tell