An old argument, but they need to move to the West Coast to support Lemoore squadrons.
The reserves and their model for where they put their units has gone back and forth over the years. Do you put the reserve units where the people live or do you put them where their mission is? Do they exist to support the fleet or is it to maintain semi-ready forces? Of course it's both goals, but if you concentrate too many reserve units in fleet concentration areas then fewer and fewer people from middle America participate in the reserves. But there's no question that spreading them out, away from fleet concentration areas and into the places everybody else lives, that comes at a cost too.
Just food for thought.
In the 1980s, a lot of augment units would drill at their local reserve center every month and then go train alongside their active duty units for those proverbial two weeks. Nowadays a lot of those reserve units have their homes at super NOSCs in Navy towns (Norfolk, San Dog, Jax, etc.) but half their people are scattered throughout various local NOSCs, geographically separated from their leadership and from coherent training plans.
I'm not sure one model is clearly superior to the other, it's just the way things are and it comes back to the question of what you really want the reserves to do and why you want them to exist.
The old "World War 3" mobilization model had a timeline for all the reserve sailors to get from their inland homes and reserve centers to their ships and squadrons. I suspect it was all fanciful because the op plan timelines would have got sped up, the ships and airplanes would have left without their reserve augment personnel, and soon after that things would have gone nuclear. That's simplifying it a lot, but...