• Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?

    Go here:

    Edit Account Details and Profile

Changes to the Intel business

Status
Not open for further replies.

wink

War Hoover NFO.
None
Super Moderator
Contributor
Already posted this article in the Crypie forum as a follow up to an existing thread. It is important info for all Intel types so I am double posting for max exposure. Intel work will be changing and becoming more operational in nature, count on it.

___________

Washington Post
March 24, 2005
Pg. 17
Pentagon To Upgrade Intelligence Structure
Officials Want Analysts on Front Lines
By Walter Pincus, Washington Post Staff Writer
The Defense Department is seeking to remodel and upgrade its intelligence structure and operations, based on experience in Afghanistan and Iraq and current and expected systems for collecting technical and human intelligence.
The changes are being promoted while the intelligence community is awaiting the confirmation of John D. Negroponte as the director of national intelligence, who under a new statute is to become the president's chief intelligence adviser, with budgetary control over some of the Pentagon's intelligence-collection agencies.
Among the first steps the Pentagon is planning is upgrading intelligence from being a staff function at headquarters to having analysts and human intelligence collectors on the front lines, particularly in the war on terrorism.
"We need close and real-time intelligence support for what we are doing," a Defense Department senior official said yesterday in describing an outline for the restructuring that he said would be part of the Pentagon's fiscal 2007 budget.
Even now, some technical collection capabilities enable Predator unmanned aircraft in Iraq to deliver real-time imagery of potential enemy targets yards or miles away to analysts working with small ground units. Those analysts can at the same time download from satellites background data from Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) and CIA files to give context to the imagery and help plan the units' moves.
The remodeling is "viewing DoD [Department of Defense] intelligence as an operational capability that is integral to joint warfare," said Lt. Col. Chris Conway, a Pentagon spokesman.
The Pentagon has already begun to overhaul and increase its human intelligence, or humint, activities "to address shortfalls," Conway said. One step was to create "tactical humint teams," with 160 operating in Iraq. They comprise fully uniformed soldiers who knock on doors to interview families and conduct some interrogations.
Less well-known, and due for expansion, is the Pentagon's clandestine collection of intelligence in foreign countries where operations may eventually take place. Such so-called battlefield preparation activities, where covert operators scour potential landing spots and target areas, took place before the Iraq invasion and have taken place in other countries, according to intelligence sources.
The Army, which carries most of the burden in Iraq, not only is going to shift more personnel into intelligence but also make it a better career path, the Defense Department senior official said. "Professionalization and sustainment of the intelligence workforce" is one of the goals of the new program, Conway said.
At a higher level, the Pentagon is looking at pulling together the heads of its eight intelligence agencies and putting them under one military commander, possibly a general rank officer. These include not only the Army, Navy, Marines and Air Force intelligence arms but also the DIA; the National Security Agency, which performs analysis of electronic intercepts; the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, which does imagery analysis; and the National Reconnaissance Office, which builds and operates satellites.
The proposed action comes at a time when Sens. Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.) and Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) have introduced a bill to create a unified intelligence command inside the Pentagon under a four-star officer.
Chambliss described the plan as creating "one point of contact for military intelligence for the new DNI and . . . a more efficient, responsive and simpler military intelligence structure."
The Pentagon planning calls for integrating some of the separate intelligence functions used by different services under one officer, perhaps wearing two hats.

__________
 

Logico

Registered User
I'm in BDCP for intel so I don't have any training or experience yet. Can anyone here tell me what they think this change might practically mean for the Navy?

Thanks.
 

wink

War Hoover NFO.
None
Super Moderator
Contributor
Intel guys, especially junior ones, will create briefs for aircrew and mid level decision makers from existing material, classified and open source. There is obviously some analysis to tailor the right material to the right audiance for the right objective. More senior Intel types will, of course, manage other Intel officers and enlisted Intelligence Specialist. They will brief even more senior decision makers and engage in more analysis of ever more raw data. Senior Intel guys will also serve as Watch Officers in Command Centers where they are critical to decision making. Now the above discription is based on my observations and the experiences of friends in the Intel business for many years at all levels. Hopefully you will get more first hand info. What is notable though is that there is no mention of Intelligence gathering and certainly no spy vs spy spook stuff. Changes will put Intel types closer to the end user of their product and make them more a part of the collection process and plug them into the early analysis. Intel guys at the junior levels will likely see more raw Intel because they are in the best position to determine what their squadron mates need to do their jobs. There will be less filtering. A quick story (ya I know, here goes the old guy again). I had a buddy that was a Navy Intel LT on Schwarzkopf's staff in Desert Storm. He did the targeting thing throughout the air war with an AF 2lt. When the ground war took off at lightening speed, there was little the CENTCOM staff could do as all their info was time late. So after sitting on their hands for a few hours the General said "go out an be Intelligence Officers". So they grabed a HUMMV, a truck and a couple soldiers from the Intel staff and they took off across the desert rummaging through Iragi command posts and air bases filling thier vehicles with valuable Intel because they knew what was useful and what wasn't. He considered it to be one of the highlights of his career as an Intel Officer. That is the kind of stuff you will see Intel types doing more and more of in the future and that is a change for the Navy.
 

Brett327

Well-Known Member
None
Super Moderator
Contributor
Interesting article, but I doubt it will have much effect on squadron level operations. You're still going to have (or be) a boot Ensign learning the ropes in your first operational command. Specific mission requirements may entail being augmented by folks with the appropriate level of knowledge or experience. I know that more senior Intel folks will deal with higher level stuff, but since this is primarily an aviation forum, the Ensign is all most of us are ever going to deal with. In my experience as a weapons school guy, squadron Intel folks are good for vanilla flavored intel, but any tip of the spear, cutting edge stuff means rolling up your sleves, getting on the SIPRNet and talking with the movers and shakers up echelon.

What does this all mean to the up and coming Intel guys? Try to be closer to the latter than the former. ;)

Good times,

Brett
 

skidkid

CAS Czar
pilot
Super Moderator
Contributor
Amen,
Same on the Green side. Ive seen very good intel bubbas and very bad (Thought the Congo was in South America). It has been my experiecnce that the pilots know the threats inside and out better than the intel guys but waht we count on them to do is tell us where they are and what kind of operating state they are in.
A good Air intel guy is such a force multiplier though a bad one doesnt drag us down too bad we just ignore him and he becomes the map
b!tch. Try to be the former and not the latter!
 

wink

War Hoover NFO.
None
Super Moderator
Contributor
O-1s will always be essentially a training position. We all know that a good NCO can do any Ensign's or Second Lieutenant's job. The nature of an aviation unit will keep first tour Intel types work pretty much as is. I do believe that in the future you will see things like more Intel guys with language skills on boarding parties conducting the interviews and reviewing manifests and other documents. Even at the squadron level, in the future, I expect they will have access to more and more raw Intel, not just pubs and messages.
 

Brett327

Well-Known Member
None
Super Moderator
Contributor
skidkid said:
A good Air intel guy is such a force multiplier though a bad one doesnt drag us down too bad we just ignore him and he becomes the map
b!tch.
Map b!tch - I love it! I'm going to have to use that one.

Brett
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top