• Please take a moment and update your account profile. If you have an updated account profile with basic information on why you are on Air Warriors it will help other people respond to your posts. How do you update your profile you ask?

    Go here:

    Edit Account Details and Profile

Why does the Marine Corps have its own "Air Force"?

jamnww

Hangar Four
pilot
except Apaches dont fly CAS usually

I also found it interesting that the Apaches wasn't even designed for CAS, but rather as an anti-armor weapon against a Soviet invasion...surprising that they haven't adapted roles yet...
 

Flash

SEVAL/ECMO
None
Super Moderator
Contributor

The USAF was trying to get rid of the A-10 for years, and only recently has made a modest investment into upgrading what is basically the same plane that was introduced in the 80's. While the F-16's keep getting block upgrades and the F-15's are gradually modified, just recently did the A-10C test fly http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?storyID=123033331 . Compare the amount of money that has gone into the A-10 vs the F-16, F-15 and especially the F-22, then tell me 'big' USAF cares about CAS.

As for transport, while there are plenty of C-17's and C-5's to go around (just try and schedule one on short notice though, it is a nightmare), there are very few intra-theater transports to go around. I am not talking about C-130's, though they are hurting with their wing-box problems and C-130J intro difficulties, but there are only a handful of smaller C-27 or C-235/295 type aircraft that the Army so desperatly needs to supply its troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Army is relying on C-23's and CH-47's to do this job because the USAF is not responsive enough and doesn't have enough C-130's and also because the normal method, ground convoys, are extremely hazardous. As a result, the Army is rapidly using up the finite life of the Sherpas and Chinooks to supply its troops in-country. What has the Air Force done in response? Hold up the procurement of intra-theater transport by demanding they have control over them instead of the Army.

http://thehill.com/thehill/export/TheHill/Business/050906_cargo.html

http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/2006/05/the-jca-program-key-west-sabotage/index.php

It is a said commentarry but the USAF seems to only concern itself with the F-22, the B-2, satellites and other really cool things like 'space wings'. Everything else be damned.......:(
 

Recidivist

Registered User
I think you guys are looking at this whole thread wrong.

The real Question is "Why does the Air Force Exist?";)
 

HeyJoe

Fly Navy! ...or USMC
None
Super Moderator
Contributor
Brett327 said:
Well, the Navy would have one hell of a time doing strike warfare without them. Brett


Sounds like a doctrinal thing. ;)



Much simpler than that....they give; we receive.....gas that is...


BTW, last time I heard, Army had more boats than the Navy (much smaller though) and more aircraft than the Air Force (mainly rotorheads) so why begrudge USMC or Navy fo rhaving their own Air Force??


Little known fact: When Presdient Kennedy and his "posse" went aboard USS Enterprise when she was brand spanking new, the Air Wing markings were "AF" and someone asked what all the "Air Force" aircraft were doing aboard a Navy aircraft carrier. Virtually on the spot, the markings were simply changed to "AE" and "AF" wasn't used until Reserve Air Wing adopted it.
 
Top