I considered just fucking off this site. But, honestly, I learn a lot here. For every 30 of you that I piss off and make insecure of your career decisions, one person learns something; that's a scientific fact.
Reconsider.
I considered just fucking off this site. But, honestly, I learn a lot here. For every 30 of you that I piss off and make insecure of your career decisions, one person learns something; that's a scientific fact.
This is even funnier when you realize there are NFOs doing the coolest part of your job (TAO) on ships all over the world. And they fucking hate it.Wish I were a pilot, on perpetual sea duty? No thanks. But as I've said... I'd take SWO over helo/MPRA pilot, and ANY NFO, any day...
And I'm ready for the, inevitable, butt-hurt reaction.
Later on, you can run for a seat on the local homeowners association and get an opportunity to cite ordinance in anger.
Hehehe. (I had the shot, there was no danger, so I took it.)
Nailed it!This is even funnier when you realize there are NFOs doing the coolest part of your job (TAO) on ships all over the world. And they fucking hate it.
D@mn. Troll much? Did your account get hacked, dude?Wish I were a pilot, on perpetual sea duty? No thanks. But as I've said... I'd take SWO over helo/MPRA pilot, and ANY NFO, any day...
And I'm ready for the, inevitable, butt-hurt reaction.
For certain missions, my understanding is that there are some functions that only Intel can perform, e.g. target vetting/no-strike list management, weaponeering to minimize collateral damage, phase II BDA. Two related AQDs are 3A1 and 3A2. Reference: http://www.public.navy.mil/bupers-npc/reference/noc/NOOCSVOL1/Documents/Manual I 61_PT_D (AQD).pdfHonest question, is VFA not getting Intel support during the mission planning?
Not arguing against how the SWOs do it. I don’t have a dog in that fight. Of course the Air Wing has support personnel that help with a myriad of operations. I was just drawing the conclusion that TLAMs have dedicated planning teams in place. And that’s all that @LFCFan was getting at. Plus, I really don’t like how he called out an intel officer for not being “url” enough...
For certain missions, my understanding is that there are some functions that only Intel can perform, e.g. target vetting/no-strike list management, weaponeering to minimize collateral damage, phase II BDA. Two related AQDs are 3A1 and 3A2. Reference: http://www.public.navy.mil/bupers-npc/reference/noc/NOOCSVOL1/Documents/Manual I 61_PT_D (AQD).pdf
Wish I were a pilot, on perpetual sea duty? No thanks. But as I've said... I'd take SWO over helo/MPRA pilot, and ANY NFO, any day...
And I'm ready for the, inevitable, butt-hurt reaction.
Wish I were a pilot, on perpetual sea duty? No thanks. But as I've said... I'd take SWO over helo/MPRA pilot, and ANY NFO, any day...
And I'm ready for the, inevitable, butt-hurt reaction.
My point isn't that most of the planning effort is done onboard.
It's that planning is only a small part of the effort to get rounds on target.
Honest question, is VFA not getting Intel support during the mission planning?
Now drawing a conclusion from the current baseline that CRUDES can't do their own mission planning would be as misguided as drawing the conclusion that TACAIR can't pull off a SAG Takedown just because you've never seen them do it. Conflating how one mission area is executed with how another would be demonstrates a pretty poor understanding of the how/why things are the way they are. Which is why he's being called out on it.
There are URL-qualified, warfare-experienced officers discussing shit here. You're a clown. STFU. CRUDES don't do mission planning for a strike? Wrong.
You're out of you're element, bro.
For certain missions, my understanding is that there are some functions that only Intel can perform, e.g. target vetting/no-strike list management, weaponeering to minimize collateral damage, phase II BDA. Two related AQDs are 3A1 and 3A2. Reference: http://www.public.navy.mil/bupers-npc/reference/noc/NOOCSVOL1/Documents/Manual I 61_PT_D (AQD).pdf
I think we've reached the "my experience has told me otherwise" / "agree to disagree" point of the conversation. I've noticed both real world and on here that SWOs who have worked as a strike officer but not at a fleet HQ disagree whereas those who have done both agree.
They do, but it's not at all like what CRUDES get from HHQ. We do traditional intel support (threat laydown and so on) but it isn't mission planning per se.
I actually do have an example of something you can't do underway that a CRUDES would need either HHQ or airwing folks do to for you, but don't feel comfortable posting it for opsec reasons. I know that's a lame cop out, but it is what it is. Bottom line: the airwing does receive tasking and support from ashore, but if need be could do literally everything from soup to nuts, and is built that way.
Wish I were a pilot, on perpetual sea duty? No thanks. But as I've said... I'd take SWO over helo/MPRA pilot, and ANY NFO, any day...
And I'm ready for the, inevitable, butt-hurt reaction.