UAVs, not just an Air Force gig anymore

Discussion in 'Military Aviation in General' started by kanakAttack, Mar 24, 2006.

    • Contributor

    Uncle Fester Big veiny triumphant bastard

    Member Since:
    Oct 7, 2007
    Message Count:
    2,448
    Ratings Received:
    +834 / 0 / -0
    ...wonder if it means anything that they're hoisting it aboard instead of doing a fly-on?
  1. gaijin6423 Ask me about ninjas!

    Member Since:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Message Count:
    1,295
    Ratings Received:
    +162 / 0 / -0
    Does the winged individual serve as an official Mission Commander, and is there any other rating/designator/whatever you call it that can? I only ask because us Marine folk have a requirement to be either a 75XX or a 72XX MOS to do so. I got roped into working as a Scan Eagle MC in Afghanistan because I was the only 72/75XX person who was consistently co-located with the ground control station.
    • Super Moderator
    • Contributor

    HeyJoe Fly Navy! ...or USMC

    Member Since:
    Dec 31, 2004
    Message Count:
    7,010
    Ratings Received:
    +918 / 0 / -0
    Fire Scout Brief

    Although this is dated from almost a year ago, this PMA-266 Fire Scout brief shows that Fire Scout was decoupled from deployment with LCS so it could achieve IOC on another Air Capable ship (as seen in photos). Brief also shows several mission scenarios and "coupling" with either MH-60R or S variants.

    [IMG]

    Air Force is hard over in its position that rated "aviators" (pilots or navs with an instrument rating) should operate their UAVs, but they are focused on higher altitudes with their Global Hawk, Reaper sand Preds. Army is diametrically opposed with their focus on lower altitudes and much smaller UAV variants. They are introducing their own Predator and Fire Scout variants so Air Force has tried to take Executive "Ownership" of UAVs twice now, but were rebuffed at OSD level both in both attempts. Navy has 2 Global Hawks as Maritime Demonstrators (gift to NGC when Fire Scout false-started several years ago) and is working the N-UCAS carrier based UAS as well a BAMS surveillance UAS that will serve alongside the P-8. Those higher end UAS will likely require winged aviators at the GCS. The lower end of the Naval UAS spectrum is much more like the Army model.
  2. S.O.B. Registered User

    Member Since:
    Jan 30, 2006
    Message Count:
    574
    Ratings Received:
    +80 / 0 / -0
    Where are you getting that info? I'm not saying you're wrong I'm just curious. I had never heard that plan.
    • Contributor

    PropAddict Now with even more awesome!

    Member Since:
    May 3, 2008
    Message Count:
    1,313
    Ratings Received:
    +371 / 0 / -0
    I always thought that was because the FARs were hard over in their position that UAVs in US airspace had to be controlled by rated pilots. No?

    <off to download new copy of FAR/AIM>
    • Super Moderator
    • Contributor

    HeyJoe Fly Navy! ...or USMC

    Member Since:
    Dec 31, 2004
    Message Count:
    7,010
    Ratings Received:
    +918 / 0 / -0
    Plenty of all sorts of UAVs are flown virtually every day by other than non rated "operators". They just aren't in the National Airspace/Airways. What happens in the MOA, stays in the MOA.
  3. HAL Pilot Thanks

    Member Since:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Message Count:
    4,477
    Ratings Received:
    +2,497 / 2 / -0
    The FARs are just advisory to military.
    • Like Like x 1
    • Contributor

    A4sForever STILL A MEAN OL' HA'OLE MAN

    Member Since:
    Dec 18, 2004
    Message Count:
    9,202
    Ratings Received:
    +1,848 / 0 / -0
    AND ... some airline pilots, too. Not suggesting violating "the MAN's" rules & regs ... but a suggestion: just don't get caught ... :)
    • Contributor

    Swanee Samsonite?! I was way off!

    Member Since:
    Apr 12, 2007
    Message Count:
    1,547
    Ratings Received:
    +306 / 0 / -1
    I've also heard (from the old man) that the AF wants rated guys flying them due to the weapons and what not they are carrying. They want guys who have been trained to fire weapons from airplanes firing weapons from airplanes. The Reaper is a pretty serious bombtruck. Not that we don't have E-dogs as tank commanders and artillery guys who make pretty much the same decisions (Though they do have O's looking over their shoulders). Maybe it's a jobs program to ensure that the Air Force will always have their rated guys on top? It wouldn't surprise me. :confused:
  4. squorch2 he will die without safety brief

    Member Since:
    Jan 4, 2004
    Message Count:
    1,765
    Ratings Received:
    +437 / 1 / -2
    I got it from the NG guys at NHA this past year... I'll try to firm it up when I get back from leave.
    • Contributor

    Flash SEVAL/ECMO

    Member Since:
    Oct 10, 2003
    Message Count:
    4,560
    Ratings Received:
    +1,100 / 1 / -11
    USAF UAV's are also usually only the most expensive ones, a single Reaper costs about $13 million and a Global Hawk a lot more. Most Army UAV's are much cheaper with only the MQ-1C Warrior approaching that cost.
  5. UpstateSouthpaw On to Whiting North

    Member Since:
    Feb 21, 2008
    Message Count:
    53
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    I know this is an old post but I have a question... Is the pilot of the Fire Scout actually on the ship in a little room with a tv screen, a joystick and a flight suit on? (this seems like it might cause problems because of the ship pitching and rolling and giving the pilot more to deal with) Or is he in Las Vegas in the back of a converted cargo trailer like the Predator pilots (I don't know exactly where the predator pilots are but I'm pretty sure they're not in the same theater as the actual planes)
    • Contributor

    bubblehead Registered Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 30, 2008
    Message Count:
    537
    Ratings Received:
    +36 / 0 / -0
    I remember reading on the Internet's that Predator pilots are at Nellis.
  6. DanMa1156 Knighthawks

    Member Since:
    Feb 18, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,174
    Ratings Received:
    +173 / 0 / -0
    • Contributor

    bubblehead Registered Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 30, 2008
    Message Count:
    537
    Ratings Received:
    +36 / 0 / -0
    oops.. my bad..
    • Super Moderator

    phrogdriver liberty risk

    Member Since:
    Oct 19, 2002
    Message Count:
    4,117
    Ratings Received:
    +1,838 / 1 / -0
    Most UASs are not flown like an actual aircraft anymore. The operator just specifies/creates waypoints and the aircraft flies to them. It's not like a flt sim, yanking and banking with stick, rudder, and throttle. Don't know about the Fire Scout in particular.
  7. HackerF15E Active Member

    Member Since:
    Oct 28, 2007
    Message Count:
    583
    Ratings Received:
    +204 / 0 / -0
    All of the Predator variants (M/RQ-1/9) are "hand-flown". The Global Hawk is operated as you say, with preplanned waypoints.
  8. cmhumphr CuMhUmPeR

    Member Since:
    Oct 21, 2008
    Message Count:
    39
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    So starting in about 2011, the Navy fleet will be one third UAV? Sorry for the late reply.
    • Contributor

    eddie Working Plan B

    Member Since:
    May 24, 2004
    Message Count:
    1,782
    Ratings Received:
    +264 / 0 / -0
    That soon?
  9. bbf7b2 Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 17, 2008
    Message Count:
    55
    Ratings Received:
    +13 / 0 / -0
    When I was on LCS-1 I talked to a Chief who said he was the one who "flew" the Fire Scout, flew in quotations because flying the Fire Scout involves sitting at a computer station and plugging in waypoints and altitudes, and just watching the monitor. The only thing that was unclear was on the armed missions who had the weapons release athority.
  10. Lobster Active Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 9, 2007
    Message Count:
    845
    Ratings Received:
    +79 / 0 / -0

    Yeah that seems waaaaaaay early...
    • Super Moderator
    • Contributor

    HeyJoe Fly Navy! ...or USMC

    Member Since:
    Dec 31, 2004
    Message Count:
    7,010
    Ratings Received:
    +918 / 0 / -0
    Fire Scout, arriving

    [IMG]

    [IMG]

    090508-N-2821G-158 ATLANTIC OCEAN (May 8, 2009) The Northrop Grumman Corporation-developed Unmanned Aerial Vehicle MQ-8B Fire Scout flies over the Atlantic Ocean. Fire Scout is embarked aboard the guided-missile frigate USS McInerney (FFG 8), while the ship prepares for an upcoming counter-illicit trafficking deployment to Latin America, where the ship is scheduled to use Fire Scout to assist with counter-drug operations. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Alan Gragg/Released)
    • Super Moderator
    • Contributor

    HeyJoe Fly Navy! ...or USMC

    Member Since:
    Dec 31, 2004
    Message Count:
    7,010
    Ratings Received:
    +918 / 0 / -0
    [IMG]

    090508-N-2821G-146 ATLANTIC OCEAN (May 8, 2009) The Northrop Grumman Corporation-developed Unmanned Aerial Vehicle MQ-8B Fire Scout hovers over the flight deck of the guided-missile frigate USS McInerney (FFG 8). McInerney is preparing for an upcoming counter-illicit trafficking deployment to Latin America, where the ship is scheduled to use Fire Scout to assist with counter-drug operations. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Alan Gragg/Released)
    • Super Moderator
    • Contributor

    HeyJoe Fly Navy! ...or USMC

    Member Since:
    Dec 31, 2004
    Message Count:
    7,010
    Ratings Received:
    +918 / 0 / -0
    [IMG]

    090508-N-2821G-059 ATLANTIC OCEAN (May 8, 2009) The Northrop Grumman Corporation-developed Unmanned Aerial Vehicle MQ-8B Fire Scout hovers over the flight deck of the guided-missile frigate USS McInerney (FFG 8). McInerney is preparing for an upcoming counter-illicit trafficking deployment to Latin America, where the ship is scheduled to use Fire Scout to assist with counter-drug operations. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Alan Gragg/Released)
    • Contributor

    Flash SEVAL/ECMO

    Member Since:
    Oct 10, 2003
    Message Count:
    4,560
    Ratings Received:
    +1,100 / 1 / -11
    What is with the special landing pad in the third photo?

Share This Page