The Great Universal Health Care Debate w/Poll (note: it just passed both houses)

Discussion in 'Current News' started by QuagmireMcGuire, Dec 17, 2007.

?

Are you in favor of Universal Health Care?

Yes, having the state take care of all my needs is great.. No responsiblilty! Whee! 9 vote(s) 4.1%
Yes, its not going to cause the USA to be a socialist nation and would be better than the current. 36 vote(s) 16.4%
Where in the constitution does it say we have to do this? 54 vote(s) 24.5%
This is communist. I'll shiv whoever passes it (special option for SOG) 74 vote(s) 33.6%
Good idea, but the govt will screw it up and cost too much. 47 vote(s) 21.4%
  1. exhelodrvr Active Member

    Member Since:
    Nov 4, 2008
    Message Count:
    568
    Ratings Received:
    +146 / 0 / -0
    LOL! That's perhaps the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard!! Please cue John McEnroe yelling "You can't be serious!!"
    • Super Moderator
    • Contributor

    Brett327 Magnum!

    Member Since:
    Dec 23, 2004
    Message Count:
    9,268
    Ratings Received:
    +2,648 / 4 / -7
    In his defense, there are a lot of people who would like to see a single payer system of socialized medicine in this country. I'm not one of them, but it's not such a ridiculous concept. It's pretty mainstream in the developed world, so while we may not agree that it should be instituted here in the US, it's not as though it's a completely ridiculous or outrageous concept.

    Brett
  2. exhelodrvr Active Member

    Member Since:
    Nov 4, 2008
    Message Count:
    568
    Ratings Received:
    +146 / 0 / -0
    It's a totally ridiculous concept to say that they should be "acting fast" on this. If the real intent was to reform the healthcare system, and not just grab power, it would be done in a series of smaller, close-to-independent steps, that could be looked at individually, and carefully. The reason that this is being rushed is not because of the urgency, it's because they don't want people to realize what the effect of the legislation will be.
    • Super Moderator
    • Contributor

    Brett327 Magnum!

    Member Since:
    Dec 23, 2004
    Message Count:
    9,268
    Ratings Received:
    +2,648 / 4 / -7
    Gotcha, agreed, although I'm not so sure the Dems intent is to deceive anyone. They've been pretty straight forward about their desire for a socialized system.

    Brett
  3. Clux4 Banned

    Member Since:
    Jul 27, 2004
    Message Count:
    846
    Ratings Received:
    +78 / 0 / -0
    Clinton was not successful in getting his wishes with regards to healthcare reform. We had a Republican administration that did not lift a finger in 8 years concerning an issue they also agreed needed reform. Republicans can say all they want, they had 8 years to fix what was broke. May the troubles of socialized healthcare bring a sense of guilt on their soul for doing nothing!! (I doubt that will ever happen)
    I am about tired of all the whining. Healthcare reform is just one of many issues and I am glad to tell you that Socialized healthcare or whatever you wish to call it, is here to stay.
  4. ryan1234 Active Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 15, 2009
    Message Count:
    407
    Ratings Received:
    +64 / 0 / -0
    An interesting part of the bill is the part where you are penalized for not complying the the mandate to the IRC. This is the part that is not constitutional and I would even say diametrically opposed to the core concepts of individual autonomy and liberty.

    As a side note the McCarran-Ferguson Act is left out of the bill, depsite the absolute power of the states to regulate health insurance unimpeded by the Federal government. The vehicle in which they passing this bill is the Commerce Clause.... but it is so twisted that now it means the government can compel people into intrastate trade.

    This is the real unconsitutional part:
    The penalty tax is not an income tax, nor an excise tax, but rather a direct tax (based on per family members, ie per person). The Constitution requires direct taxes to be apportioned by each state, it says nothing about the federal neo-police power to do so over a non-event.
    • Super Moderator
    • Contributor

    Brett327 Magnum!

    Member Since:
    Dec 23, 2004
    Message Count:
    9,268
    Ratings Received:
    +2,648 / 4 / -7
    How about we just call it a fine and it's all good, no? Anyhow, if serious legal schollars deem this program unconstitutional, it will be challenged. Otherwise, everyone can just STFU about it. :D

    Brett
  5. Random8145 Registered User

    Member Since:
    Jul 5, 2006
    Message Count:
    137
    Ratings Received:
    +85 / 0 / -0
    This healthcare bill is not "reform" in any way whatsoever. It is a cluster**** of epic proportions (pardon the word).

    The ONLY reason the Democrats are rushing it through is because they have a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to take control of a sixth of the U.S. economy.

    The bill has all sorts of new regulatory agencies, commissions, and rules that no one really knows how they will all interact.

    We have no need for socialized medicine in this nation. The private sector can handle it just fine. The only reason other countries have such systems is because they are much more socialist-leaning then the United States.

    We are the greatest nation in the world precisely because we do NOT model ourselves after these other nations.
  6. Clux4 Banned

    Member Since:
    Jul 27, 2004
    Message Count:
    846
    Ratings Received:
    +78 / 0 / -0
    We are the greatest for many reasons. The one you give is not.
  7. Random8145 Registered User

    Member Since:
    Jul 5, 2006
    Message Count:
    137
    Ratings Received:
    +85 / 0 / -0
    In that we do not copy other nations with their big government, high-taxation and regulation, it is.
  8. Clux4 Banned

    Member Since:
    Jul 27, 2004
    Message Count:
    846
    Ratings Received:
    +78 / 0 / -0
    I think we have the biggest government, so that is out the water. We don't have as much taxes but we will get there pretty soon as we need to do something to the national debt. We have regulations and lots of them because we have to make sure that people and businesses are not just taking matters into their own hands. Most developed countries have a lot of regulations. So, how are we different?
    • Contributor

    Ken_gone_flying "I live vicariously through myself."

    Member Since:
    Nov 10, 2006
    Message Count:
    1,082
    Ratings Received:
    +230 / 0 / -0
    • Like Like x 1
    • Contributor

    Cleonard19 Member

    Member Since:
    Oct 8, 2007
    Message Count:
    211
    Ratings Received:
    +19 / 0 / -0
    +1 for his "old man shuffle" back to the podium.
  9. Clux4 Banned

    Member Since:
    Jul 27, 2004
    Message Count:
    846
    Ratings Received:
    +78 / 0 / -0
    I am not sure that is what you exactly call "calling someone out". Obviously, he was not prepared for it but no big deal. No excessive stuttering either.
    • Contributor

    Ken_gone_flying "I live vicariously through myself."

    Member Since:
    Nov 10, 2006
    Message Count:
    1,082
    Ratings Received:
    +230 / 0 / -0
    Clux, yes, he got called out. And rightfully so.
    • Like Like x 1
  10. boobcheese Registered User

    Member Since:
    Sep 11, 2004
    Message Count:
    172
    Ratings Received:
    +22 / 0 / -0
    Unless I'm missing something, that's a pretty uneventful clip. I can only assume there was something actually substantive that has since been removed.
    • Super Moderator
    • Contributor

    Brett327 Magnum!

    Member Since:
    Dec 23, 2004
    Message Count:
    9,268
    Ratings Received:
    +2,648 / 4 / -7
    Stupid. What's the issue here? That CinC wished the troops a merry Christmas? Standard, BFD, is anyone surprised?

    Brett
    • Like Like x 1
    • Administrator
    • Contributor

    Steve Wilkins Teaching pigs to dance, one pig at a time.

    Member Since:
    Mar 1, 1999
    Message Count:
    3,107
    Ratings Received:
    +348 / 1 / -0
    Ok, so he had to be prompted. Nothing unexpected here.
  11. Clux4 Banned

    Member Since:
    Jul 27, 2004
    Message Count:
    846
    Ratings Received:
    +78 / 0 / -0
    I guess he did because Ken says so!!. 1 Brownie point for Republicans and 0 for Democrats. Whoopi

    If you feel hurt he forgot to wish the military a merry christmas, what about the firefighters, the police, government workers, the intelligence community. Get a grip.
    • Super Moderator
    • Contributor

    HeyJoe Fly Navy! ...or USMC

    Member Since:
    Dec 31, 2004
    Message Count:
    7,010
    Ratings Received:
    +918 / 0 / -0
    It's Christmas GUYS (ladies don't seem to partake in partisan bashing). There's a truce in effect. No more opposing party bashing...at least today.
    • Contributor

    Recovering LSO Suck Less

    Member Since:
    Feb 20, 2007
    Message Count:
    1,551
    Ratings Received:
    +934 / 0 / -1
    If someone spends 20 years in the military and then retires, chooses to keep Tricare until Medicare takes over wont they have spent their entire life using a single payer government option? Am I understanding this incorrectly or does it seem a bit odd for a bunch of people who are currently using such a "terrible" system to be so outspoken against it?

    Personally, the worst part of this bill is the proposed mandate it presents. FORCING someone to to use the government plan or pay fines on top of their own private provider premiums strikes me as a much greater problem than the coverage itself.

    Steve, no matter what you post here and regardless of the condescending tone you use to present your arguments - polling has MAJOR faults. UF offers a great course called Public Opinion and Government Policy, check it out...

    Now that its fairly obvious that some form of this bill is going to pass it seems to me that it would be in the GOP's interest (assuming they have any of our interests in mind) to work towards making the bill the best that it can rather than continuing to bring themselves down to the bickering and petty level of their foes across the aisle. Not holding my breath.
    • Like Like x 1
  12. magnetfreezer Active Member

    Member Since:
    May 21, 2007
    Message Count:
    274
    Ratings Received:
    +47 / 0 / -0
    Not at all. The "single payer government option" for mil/retirees is not a welfare benefit, it's a compensation for your military service. Same as if you worked for a private company and they gave you insurance for free. The difference is the military has a lot of their own infrastructure because it makes sense (deployed medical personnel, flight docs, bases in tiny towns, etc)
  13. Spekkio He bowls overhand.

    Member Since:
    Feb 2, 2006
    Message Count:
    1,492
    Ratings Received:
    +337 / 3 / -9
    Sidenote: The thread title is misleading; since the bill was amended in the Senate to remove the public option, it technically hasn't passed both houses. It still must go back to the House and be voted on in its current state.
    • Contributor

    Recovering LSO Suck Less

    Member Since:
    Feb 20, 2007
    Message Count:
    1,551
    Ratings Received:
    +934 / 0 / -1
    Call it what you want, a "welfare benefit" or compensation - the fact of the matter is that, in execution, it is a exactly what everyone is afraid of now. These concerns are not without some justification but for some perspective - if you're in the military, its what you have now.
    • Administrator
    • Contributor

    Steve Wilkins Teaching pigs to dance, one pig at a time.

    Member Since:
    Mar 1, 1999
    Message Count:
    3,107
    Ratings Received:
    +348 / 1 / -0
    Did I say it didn't have faults? Nope. Honestly, I haven't said a whole lot about it. It's interesting though that when poll after poll after poll after poll shows that Americans disapprove of these measures, suddenly the polls mean nothing. A single poll, signifying a snapshot in time, is meaningless to me. However, when the same results are exhibited over a period of time from multiple polling sources, should we not be asking ourselves if maybe, just maybe, there might be something to it.

    If I get a Masters in Public Policy from UF and take the course you suggest, will my comments then have credence in your eyes? Will I learn the errors of my ways?

    And my tone isn't condescending. Arrogant, yes. But definitely not condescending. :icon_wink

Share This Page