Nuke pipeline vs. NFO/Pilot pipeline

Discussion in 'Surface/Submarine (Nuclear Power)' started by Sarpedon, Feb 8, 2007.

  1. Sarpedon ET2(SS/DV)

    Member Since:
    Feb 8, 2007
    Message Count:
    5
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Hey guys, I'm currently a nuke ET on a sub and I'm considering being a pilot in a few years (I'm only 20 and I just showed up to the boat in June so I have a while to think about it).

    I read the gouge on API (http://www.airwarriors.com/forum/showthread.php?t=14323) and the description of the curriculum and exams sounds a lot like power school to me. As I was going through the pipeline (And I'm sure a lot of you prior nukes heard this too) they told us that the nuclear pipeline was one of the hardest programs around.

    My question is, how do both pipelines compare, difficulty wise? Obviously the nuke pipeline required very little physical strength, but it was still pretty tough. Obviously everyone's different and anything could happen, but I've made it through the nuke pipeline. Is it safe to say I'll probably make it through the pilot program? When I was going through, there was an approx. 90% pass rate throughout the entire pipeline. What percentage of student aviators make it through and become pilots/NFOs? I've only heard rumors about those numbers...

    Any information is greatly appreciated. Thanks a bunch!
    • Super Moderator
    • Contributor

    wink VS NFO. Blue and Gold Off. Former Recruiter.

    Member Since:
    May 21, 2002
    Message Count:
    2,754
    Ratings Received:
    +813 / 0 / -0
    Keep in mind that you are comparing the enlisted nuke program with the NFO/Pilot pipeline. Perhaps a more reasonable comparison, if there is one, would be to compare the officer nuke program, to include prototype, with flight school. In that comparison, I would say that the nuke program is probably a little harder. I am thinking mostly about prototype where the watches can be very draining and come one after another with little relief. Flight school can run very sporadicly. There is often plenty of down time to prepare for flights and study for exams or briefs. Keep in mind that that is my experience. Some guys just happen to enjoy the nuke type of program so they would find it more enjoyable and perhaps easier then flight school. There are a couple former enlisted nukes on AW. They will probably have a more recent and informed point of view then me. I am sure everyone here will tell you to not give up on your dream of getting a commission and going aviation. It might seem like you have a lot of time, but it flies by. Stay focused. Qualify rapidly on the boat and get outstanding evals. Start which ever commissioning program you will qualify for as soon as you can. Good luck.
    • Super Moderator
    • Contributor

    wink VS NFO. Blue and Gold Off. Former Recruiter.

    Member Since:
    May 21, 2002
    Message Count:
    2,754
    Ratings Received:
    +813 / 0 / -0
    Along these lines, in the nuke world every procedure (as I recall) is read from a book or check list. Virtually nothing is done from memory, even though a nuke's head is filled with all sorts of useless data and plenty of brain power. In aviation we respond to all kinds of emergencies and perform procedures from memory under time constraints and other pressures.
  2. Piperdriver Member

    Member Since:
    Apr 8, 2004
    Message Count:
    80
    Ratings Received:
    +11 / 0 / -0
    You can be the smartest, fastest thinking guy around but you also need the monkey skills too. I've seen some very bright people wash out of pilot training and it wasn't because they didn't study, they just didn't have the hands on skills it takes to fly a military aircraft.
    You can spit out EP's, limits, procedures, ect all day long but the trouble for some is when they have to do that and fly a plane....

    I'm sure if you can get though Nuke school you shouldn't have too much trouble in API, ground school or memorzing procedures but it's impossible to tell what kind of difficulty you'll have actually flying an airplane. For some it comes easy for others it never comes....good luck.
  3. Thisguy Pain-in-the-dick

    Member Since:
    Jan 12, 2004
    Message Count:
    1,615
    Ratings Received:
    +128 / 0 / -0
    I think they're letting people lat transfer to other communities, but I doubt that Nuke officer would be one of them, mainly because of the screening process. You need to be invited to the interview in DC, then go through the technical interviews, then sit in front of the 4-star that's in charge of the Nuclear program.
  4. illinijoe05 Nachos

    Member Since:
    Jan 21, 2005
    Message Count:
    170
    Ratings Received:
    +22 / 0 / -0
    Go for it man. Dont worry about how hard it is or isnt going to be. Know this, if a person wants it bad enough (and are medically qualified), anyone can make it through flight school. Good luck.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. othromas Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 25, 2005
    Message Count:
    321
    Ratings Received:
    +20 / 0 / -0
    I'll bet if you PM Scoober78 he could give you some insight.
    • Administrator
    • Contributor

    Steve Wilkins Teaching pigs to dance, one pig at a time.

    Member Since:
    Mar 1, 1999
    Message Count:
    3,107
    Ratings Received:
    +348 / 1 / -0
    I was a nuke EM and can probably give you a pretty good picture for a comparison. I went through A LOT of formal training in the navy in my 13+ years of active duty (nuke power/sub related, aviation, and surface warfare). For me, the nuke power pipeline ranks #1 in academic difficulty level with aviation coming in #2. Don't sweat API. It doesn't even compare to the difficulty of nuke land, not even close. Whether it's safe to say that you'll make it through is anyone's guess. I didn't make it through. I DOR'd even though I was doing great in the program. People don't make it through for various reasons.

    If you're worried that you won't make it through because it might be too academically rigorous for you, put that worry to bed right now. There WILL be times when you'll have flashbacks to 'Nam....ooops, I mean power school, but those periods pass fairly quickly.

    In Engineering (ship propulsion), we have EP's just like aviators do, except there is no ejection handle. :icon_rage Immediate Action procedures are not read from a book or checklist. They are memorized just as EP's are and are done under time constraints and other pressures as well, just as EP's are.
    • Like Like x 1
  6. HAL Pilot Thanks

    Member Since:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Message Count:
    4,477
    Ratings Received:
    +2,500 / 2 / -0
    Well you can always put on a life jacket and jump overboard....or maybe use a boat or life raft.....:D
    • Administrator
    • Contributor

    Steve Wilkins Teaching pigs to dance, one pig at a time.

    Member Since:
    Mar 1, 1999
    Message Count:
    3,107
    Ratings Received:
    +348 / 1 / -0
    In a sub? That would be pretty neat trick.
  7. HAL Pilot Thanks

    Member Since:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Message Count:
    4,477
    Ratings Received:
    +2,500 / 2 / -0
    Well if it's on the surface.........yeah my reading comprehension sucked.
  8. Pcola04/30 Professional Michigan Hater

    Member Since:
    May 19, 2004
    Message Count:
    286
    Ratings Received:
    +24 / 0 / -0
    Sar,
    Prior nuke MM here, most of your questions have already been answered but I would second that academically, Nuke school enlisted and especially officer versions, are head and shoulders above aviation training in difficulty. Nuke school is alot more structured than aviation ground training, especially once you are past API. You will for the most part be on the big boy program.

    As for attrition rates.....my personal experiences YMMV. Nuke school maybe 10%. Flight training..... 50% of my primary class, and I saw a crap load of people attrite from various portions of flight training. It is alot more common to see someone getting the boot from flight training than from nuke school.

    Best of luck.....focus on the positive and bet on success not failure.
    • Like Like x 1
  9. TrunkMonkey Spy Navy

    Member Since:
    Oct 24, 2004
    Message Count:
    149
    Ratings Received:
    +16 / 0 / -0
    When I was kicked out of NFO flight school, I was initally told that I could redesignate to "any other officer community I wanted". After attempting to redesignate as a SNA, that was quickly amended to any officer community *except* pilot/NFO, nuke, or medical that would agree to take me.
  10. Thisguy Pain-in-the-dick

    Member Since:
    Jan 12, 2004
    Message Count:
    1,615
    Ratings Received:
    +128 / 0 / -0
    Ha ha...slick move.
    • Super Moderator
    • Contributor

    wink VS NFO. Blue and Gold Off. Former Recruiter.

    Member Since:
    May 21, 2002
    Message Count:
    2,754
    Ratings Received:
    +813 / 0 / -0

    I suppose they could have been more clear. Maybe they didn't think someone that didn't make the NFO cut would have the balls to apply for SNA, where basic NFO skills are required of a pilot as well. The fact is the big book of This Is The Way It Is, LIve With It states that anyone that fails to complete any (read pilot/NFO/NAV from any service) flight training program is ineligible for SNFO or SNA. As many guys that came after you were sent home, you are fortunate to be making a good career for yourself. Glad it worked out.
  11. TrunkMonkey Spy Navy

    Member Since:
    Oct 24, 2004
    Message Count:
    149
    Ratings Received:
    +16 / 0 / -0
    Trust me, I'm grateful every day for the chance to continue serving, and I love the job I have now. I didn't mean to come off as bitter or not understanding why things happened the way they did. Just joking, and trying to let the OP know that there will be no post-flight school nuke school opportunities.
    • Contributor

    joboy_2.0 professional undergraduate

    Member Since:
    Nov 12, 2006
    Message Count:
    383
    Ratings Received:
    +24 / 0 / -0
    I was just a bit suspicious with the super sweet deal the the NUPOC guys get, that puts even the BDCPers to shame. That's when I really thought about living on a sub...:eek:
    • Like Like x 1
    • Super Moderator
    • Contributor

    wink VS NFO. Blue and Gold Off. Former Recruiter.

    Member Since:
    May 21, 2002
    Message Count:
    2,754
    Ratings Received:
    +813 / 0 / -0

    No worries. I understand. Although guys do sometimes redesignate from SNA to NFO it is fairly rare these days. And even then, it is only if the guy is simply lacking some advanced monkey skills. He still has to be able to keep up with the plane and make sound tactical and safety judgments.
    • Administrator
    • Contributor

    Steve Wilkins Teaching pigs to dance, one pig at a time.

    Member Since:
    Mar 1, 1999
    Message Count:
    3,107
    Ratings Received:
    +348 / 1 / -0
    The OP (original poster) should understand that post-flight school nuke opportunities come and go. If they need nukes, you're qualified, and you want to be a nuke, it is always a safe bet to go ahead and apply for redesignation.
  12. EM1 Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit

    Member Since:
    Nov 18, 2006
    Message Count:
    177
    Ratings Received:
    +22 / 0 / -0
    Having sat in the 4-star's chair, I can tell you that the interviews are nothing to sweat, especially if you have a good record of prior nuclear experience to back you up. In my power school class we had a LT who failed out of his flight school, and was no worse off than anyone else. One thing that hurt him though was making O4 without a dept head tour under your belt is almost impossible in the submarine community, just something to think about, in your case you may be able to squeeze in 20 before your HYT. Also, I can tell you that you are probably more capable academically than you may realize by making it through the pipeline, enlisted or EOOW. The only difference in curriculum is on the third floor, they derive the equations. Just keep in mind that as an EOOW student, you don't actually operate anything, given that, your enlisted experience should put you at an advantage. If you fail out, given the state of the nuclear officer community, I don't think it would be a stretch to send you back to a submarine.
    • Like Like x 1
  13. Sarpedon ET2(SS/DV)

    Member Since:
    Feb 8, 2007
    Message Count:
    5
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Thanks for the good info, EM1. Though that brings up another topic that I know very little about: High Year Tenure. How does that work? If it's what I think it is, it's what says that a first class can't go past 20 years, a chief can't go past something like 22 or 24, and a senior chief can't go past 26 (I think). I have no idea what the numbers are like on the officer side.

    Thanks again everyone
    ET3/SS "Sarpedon"
  14. EM1 Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit

    Member Since:
    Nov 18, 2006
    Message Count:
    177
    Ratings Received:
    +22 / 0 / -0
    Its a little more complicated on the officer side from what I understand. The way I've heard it, promotion to O3 is all but automatic (all fully qualified will get promoted, they did away with the board in 03 I think). For O4 it gets a little trickier as O4 through O6 are known as "Control Grades" and as such, their numbers are set by law. When you get commissioned, you will be assigned a "lineal number" and every year the officer communities will announce the senior in zone and junior in zone eligible for promotion. By looking at the navadmin, you can determine if you are below zone (being looked at for early promotion), in zone (at a point where you should get promoted) or above zone (been passed over before when you were in zone). Generally you will get two looks "below zone" before you are in zone, but a lot of that depends on the community and the numbers in the control grades. The long and short of it is that if you get passed over in zone, and subsequently above zone, you will probably get asked to resign in most cases, and at least in the submarine community, if you don't have a dept head tour in by your above zone look, getting promoted probably won't happen. As the numbers change annually, its hard to get a feel for exactly how much time you will have in before you get your above zone look, I've been told a good rule of thumb is that you can probably get away with doing about ten years on the dark side without making LCDR, before they will make you resign. Using myself as an example, I'll have 11 years in when I get commissioned (8 in now plus 3 years of school), which means that I'll need 9 more to get to 20, therefore 9 < 10, therefore I hopefully won't get forced out if I fail to make O4. Hope all this helps, if you want more specifics, I'd bet someone in your wardroom could help you more, JOs usually seem more than happy to try and explain their overly complicated advancement system. Might even kill a whole midwatch doing it :)
    • Contributor

    scoober78 (HCDAW)

    Member Since:
    Aug 11, 2006
    Message Count:
    2,321
    Ratings Received:
    +727 / 0 / -1
    [IMG]

    They say they work....I was always sceptical....If you get it...you get it.;)
  15. EM1 Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit

    Member Since:
    Nov 18, 2006
    Message Count:
    177
    Ratings Received:
    +22 / 0 / -0
    We always say that they're for parents and congressmen. Nothing beats climbing into the hatch with an inspection team member, and playing with a bunch of valves you can't see through the fog on the cheap plastic window. We would have failed our TRE, if we hadn't heard they were making people do that. Good thing we got a three month work up to practice escaping every after watch:) I still don't think I would try using them. You gotta be in some dire straits, and if you are, why the $##$@ are you trying to leave? I guess they have to make somebody feel better...
  16. EM1 Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit

    Member Since:
    Nov 18, 2006
    Message Count:
    177
    Ratings Received:
    +22 / 0 / -0
    Sorry to resurect this one, I was trying to figure out how to add a signature and accidentally put a post up here.

Share This Page