New wings approved for AMDO/Aviation LDO/CWOs

Discussion in 'Aviation Maintenance Duty Officer (AMDO)' started by Renegade One, Feb 16, 2009.

    • Contributor

    Ken_gone_flying "I live vicariously through myself."

    Member Since:
    Nov 10, 2006
    Message Count:
    1,081
    Ratings Received:
    +230 / 0 / -0

    My brother is an Air Force Reservist and I always use to joke him about that too. I was an active duty E-5 (3 years overseas) and had four rows of ribbons. He had two less years in the military and only worked a weekend a month and wasn't too far behind me.
  1. TheBubba 1300 Club

    Member Since:
    May 5, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,952
    Ratings Received:
    +217 / 0 / -0
    Because you are rated as a Naval Aviator or Naval Flight Officer at the completion of flight school. Isn't it true that your designator isn't whatever a pin-wearing shoe's is until you get the blessing from your skipper that you've successfully earned your pin?

    Flight school is essentially a huge PQS that results in a qualification. There would be too many different instructions on how one would earn their wings should you push it to the RAG/Fleet squadron level. When would you give a F/A-18 pilot his wings vs an F/A-18F pilot? What about a P-3 NFO vs an ECMO? Each community within aviation would have to essentially have its own set of regs on how to earn wings.

    And what do you mean after you qualify? Qualify as mission commander? Aircraft commander? 1P? Section lead? Division Lead?
  2. Pags Boat Donkey

    Member Since:
    Sep 10, 2003
    Message Count:
    3,051
    Ratings Received:
    +470 / 0 / -0
    Wings are pretty much the only warfare device that is given upon completion of a formal school instead of a PQS done at the fleet level. Others I can think of that require a PQS are SWO, Dolphins, ESWS and EAWS. There was talk of not giving aircrew their wings until they finished a PQS at the squadron vice out of the RAG. Not sure what happened to that.
    • Contributor

    bert Trying out the real world

    Member Since:
    Feb 12, 2007
    Message Count:
    1,010
    Ratings Received:
    +357 / 0 / -0
    I've seen the AMDO pqs - they aren't just giving it away (certainly compared to the aviation supply device, for instance).

    I'd rather see good maintenance officers get those wings than have "HAC, but..."s keep theirs.
    • Like Like x 1
  3. S.O.B. Registered User

    Member Since:
    Jan 30, 2006
    Message Count:
    574
    Ratings Received:
    +80 / 0 / -0
    I agree, seeing an AMDO with some sort of wings doesn't seem as ridiculous as a JG that attrited from the FRS wearing NA wings.

    If you can't fly for any reason other then medical the wings should no longer be worn.
    • Super Moderator
    • Contributor

    BigIron Program Office nerd.

    Member Since:
    Apr 10, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,718
    Ratings Received:
    +235 / 0 / -0
    What about when you're on DIFDEN post DH and there aren't flying orders available?
    • Contributor

    insanebikerboy Internet killed the television star

    Member Since:
    Feb 3, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,969
    Ratings Received:
    +456 / 2 / -0
    What about a lat transfer to another community, say later in a career?
    • Contributor

    loadtoad Active Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 18, 2004
    Message Count:
    365
    Ratings Received:
    +74 / 0 / -0
    This is no different than the Navy. I cannot tell you how many Ensign's I have seen running around with 4 ribbons or more months out of the Academy or ROTC. Same goes for a lot of the E-3's in the Navy.

    About the ONLY branch I do not see this is the Marine Corps.
  4. HAL Pilot Thanks

    Member Since:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Message Count:
    4,477
    Ratings Received:
    +2,497 / 2 / -0
    I blame it on the supply weenies. They started this madness with all their different devices. "Oh....I'm a SWOchop....and a SUBchop...yup, I'm an AIRchop too!" This made the medical guys feel inadequate and follow suit, and it expanded from there.
    You're fucking support. If you want to be anything else, redesignate URL.
  5. S.O.B. Registered User

    Member Since:
    Jan 30, 2006
    Message Count:
    574
    Ratings Received:
    +80 / 0 / -0
    Sure, didn't think of that one. What I should have said is: if you're no longer flying for a performance related issue then you shouldn't be wearing wings.
    • Super Moderator
    • Contributor

    nittany03 We be jammin'

    Member Since:
    Jan 4, 2003
    Message Count:
    3,500
    Ratings Received:
    +675 / 0 / -0
    Bullshit. The provision is there if you are FNAEBed due to "bringing disgrace upon naval aviation" or "willful violation of rules and regulations." So if you're an idiot, they're gone anyway. Why kick someone in the nuts unnecessarily? How about two guys who attrite out of tailhook land because they can't fly the ball well enough. One gets a lat transfer to P-3s, but the other's year group is overmanned, and gets sent to be an Intel O. Why should guy #2 lose his wings when he did no worse than guy #1?

    I think with all the senior leadership eyeballs on the case of anyone who gets FNAEBed, they can be trusted to decide whether someone who attrites deserves A(3), B(1) or B(2). If you're that worried about people earning wings who can't measure up, attrite 'em before they get 'em.
    • Like Like x 1
  6. scoolbubba Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 4, 2007
    Message Count:
    3,540
    Ratings Received:
    +1,644 / 1 / -2
    Not me! All my buds from school who went marine ground who have some chest candy saw a pic from my winging and started calling me Uno since I've still got a single lonely ribbon.
  7. S.O.B. Registered User

    Member Since:
    Jan 30, 2006
    Message Count:
    574
    Ratings Received:
    +80 / 0 / -0
    Why would guy #2 want to wear his wings? So he can explain to folks the rest of his career why he's not flying? The dude should move on embrace being an INTEL O.
    • Contributor

    loadtoad Active Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 18, 2004
    Message Count:
    365
    Ratings Received:
    +74 / 0 / -0
    Did these fellas who went Marine ground spend two years in flight school?

    My point is that I have seen several LTJG's or ENS's sporting 4/5 ribbons and have yet to even get into the fleet. Kind of a lot of chest candy for never being operational IMO.
  8. MasterBates Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    May 31, 2006
    Message Count:
    9,762
    Ratings Received:
    +1,772 / 0 / -2
    When I winged, I had 1 medal/ribbon.. NDSM for being in on 9/11. That was it.

    Heck, I did not even have a full row of ribbons until I was almost done with my first fleet tour.
    • Super Moderator
    • Contributor

    nittany03 We be jammin'

    Member Since:
    Jan 4, 2003
    Message Count:
    3,500
    Ratings Received:
    +675 / 0 / -0
    Because he earned them. Because people with many stars on their collars, more hours than God, and who have worn those same wings since before he was born had his wings on the chopping block, and chose not to take them. I'd trust their judgement. In fact, I already did.

    A FNAEB is already a uniquely humiliating experience at best. More so than attriting out of flight school, I would think, just due to the drawn-out nature of the thing. I wouldn't wish one on my worst enemy. That said, it's one of the fairest processes I've seen in my career by the time all is said and done. Pulling someone's wings for doing no more than busting their ass to the limit of their capabilities is adding insult to injury. They apparently proved they had what it takes, or why did they get winged in the first place? Maybe the vagaries of the personnel system just put them in the wrong aircraft. I bet there are winged helo guys out there who might not be able to take a trap, and winged fixed-wing guys who might not be able to hover.

    Bottom line is, you can bite off a FNAEB if you're a solid guy or girl whose best isn't good enough. You can also get one for booming over your hometown airport at 50 feet and 500 knots. I think the former deserve not to be lumped in with the latter in the end.
    • Like Like x 3
  9. scoolbubba Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 4, 2007
    Message Count:
    3,540
    Ratings Received:
    +1,644 / 1 / -2
    No, they didn't. They spent 13 months in Iraq. It's said very much tongue in cheek.
  10. NYYanks Tweaking off my coffee

    Member Since:
    Aug 24, 2009
    Message Count:
    148
    Ratings Received:
    +8 / 0 / -0
    WRT da ribbons, for those who may not know, CNIC issued an awards memo earlier in the year for all shore installations (I believe it was for ALL) to receive...hmmmm... I wanna say a MUC. I'll track down the msg and post later in the week if people actually care. I just wasn't sure if things like that, or the GWOTSM are issued to school commands. I know some Ensigns that role through with more then the pizza stain on their uniform may also have received their rifle and pistol bit. Speaking of which, if there are Navy personnel who wanna earn em and haven't yet, shoot me a PM. Once in a while we will go down to the range for quals, depending on course a few different issues I won't post here. If interested, shoot me yer info and I'll let you know via global, when the next time we are gonna go. Just fyi, the shooting is done over at NASK.
  11. navy09 Registered User

    Member Since:
    Apr 16, 2006
    Message Count:
    713
    Ratings Received:
    +63 / 0 / -0
    ^Generous offer. I'd pay money to go to SAMI school :D
  12. niktam New Member

    Member Since:
    May 31, 2009
    Message Count:
    69
    Ratings Received:
    +4 / 0 / -0
    like to see a copy of that message, if it happened before september, then I am an E-6....LOL
  13. PR1 H Perpetually fixing cranial/rectal inversions

    Member Since:
    Sep 13, 2009
    Message Count:
    85
    Ratings Received:
    +28 / 0 / -0
    MUC is not a personal award so wouldn't count towards your final multiple.

    As for the GWOTSM, you have to actually go over there. I didn't get mine issued until I was over there the first time. Sucks that even though I was supporting operations over in Iraq, Afghanistan and Somalia... since my boots weren't on the ground, I don't qualify for the Iraq or Afghanistan campaign medals.
  14. Bevo16 Registered User

    Member Since:
    Mar 24, 2003
    Message Count:
    1,242
    Ratings Received:
    +758 / 0 / -0
    I know plenty of people who would trade 3 inches of ribbon for not getting blown up and shot.

    Count me with the folks who think the "campaign medals" should go to the people actually fighting in the campaign. Not getting medals that you don't rate (due to the qualifications for the award) does not "suck". Getting shot at "sucks".

    The "supported the war in the rear, with the gear" medal is described here:

    Wiki Link
    • Contributor

    BACONATOR Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    May 2, 2007
    Message Count:
    3,824
    Ratings Received:
    +535 / 5 / -0
    I haven't seen anything more than the pistol/rifle qual ribbons, with maybe an odd ribbon or two as a very rare exception, for the non-priors.

    I am RAG complete and have a pizza stain and wings. How many of your E-dog AF ribbons are you allowed to still wear? ;)
  15. DocT Dean of Students

    Member Since:
    Jul 9, 2003
    Message Count:
    728
    Ratings Received:
    +65 / 0 / -0
    The Global War on Terror Expeditionary Medal requires deployment.
    The GWOTSM just requires service in support of designated operations.
  16. phrogpilot73 Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 8, 2005
    Message Count:
    6,830
    Ratings Received:
    +2,254 / 0 / -2
    Dude, I think you're confusing the Global War on Terror Expeditionary Medal with the Global War on Terror Service Medal. The latter is the latest, greatest NDM. I got my GWOTEM for the opening days of OIF, flying off a boat that was in the Med, across Turkey and into Northern Iraq. Is that in the rear with the gear?

    • Like Like x 1

Share This Page