I’m sure you Hornet types already saw this coming...
http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zon...t-fleet-to-prop-up-beleaguered-usmc-squadrons
http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zon...t-fleet-to-prop-up-beleaguered-usmc-squadrons
Besides the RAGS, does the Navy have any D squadrons?
No. Never as far as I know. Too little gas to be a shipboard jet.
Did the Navy even buy the ability to missionize the rear cockpit? At -106 all of the D's were pilot trainers.
No USMC RWSO's (or IWSO's for that matter) at 106. Can't speak to 122/125 though- but I doubt it there as well.Doubtful. I know we had a handful of the D's at -101 configured as "D+" (missionized/"night attack"), but that served a useful purpose to train RWSO's. Did they do USMC RWSO's at 106/122/125? If not, can't see there being a purpose.
No USMC RWSO's (or IWSO's for that matter) at 106. Can't speak to 122/125 though- but I doubt it there as well.
Besides the RAGS, does the Navy have any D squadrons?
No. Never as far as I know. Too little gas to be a shipboard jet.