Likelihood of being selected to go P3?

Discussion in 'Primary' started by JCUSN, Feb 3, 2012.

  1. MasterBates Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    May 31, 2006
    Message Count:
    9,762
    Ratings Received:
    +1,772 / 0 / -2
    Except this violates the zeroth law of Naval Aviation.

    Never fly the A model of ANYTHING.
    • Like Like x 2
    • Contributor

    CommodoreMid Whateva! I do what I want!

    Member Since:
    Aug 3, 2004
    Message Count:
    1,286
    Ratings Received:
    +245 / 1 / -1
    Do you know what squadron you're going to yet?
    • Contributor

    Recovering LSO Suck Less

    Member Since:
    Feb 20, 2007
    Message Count:
    1,544
    Ratings Received:
    +918 / 0 / -1
    I presume this thread hasn't been locked because the "what are my chances" question has to do with P-3s.......? :confused:
    • Like Like x 2
    • Super Moderator
    • Contributor

    ea6bflyr Working Class Bum

    Member Since:
    Nov 27, 2002
    Message Count:
    2,812
    Ratings Received:
    +571 / 0 / -0
    • Like Like x 1
  2. scoolbubba Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 4, 2007
    Message Count:
    3,540
    Ratings Received:
    +1,644 / 1 / -2
    Chances of misery, hate, discontent, and self loathing? Oh, right around 100%. Enjoy! :)
    • Super Moderator
    • Contributor

    HooverPilot CODPilot

    Member Since:
    Aug 22, 2003
    Message Count:
    1,236
    Ratings Received:
    +162 / 0 / -0
    Except the COD. The A model is all we will ever get...
    • Like Like x 1
  3. MasterBates Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    May 31, 2006
    Message Count:
    9,762
    Ratings Received:
    +1,772 / 0 / -2
    Technically you have the C-2A(R), so it's not REALLY and A model.

    Or the per diem makes you forget about the A model thing. Not sure.
    • Super Moderator
    • Contributor

    HooverPilot CODPilot

    Member Since:
    Aug 22, 2003
    Message Count:
    1,236
    Ratings Received:
    +162 / 0 / -0
    The per diem may be what does it.... I need to go get more to be sure.

    Unfortunately, my per diem these days doesn't involve flying. Lots of talking to aviators about their EW, but no flying.
  4. IRfly Registered User

    Member Since:
    Jul 3, 2005
    Message Count:
    328
    Ratings Received:
    +104 / 0 / -0
    Yeah, the novelty hasn't worn off yet. Nor has the sheer astonishment.
    • Contributor

    jt71582 On the RAG

    Member Since:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Message Count:
    939
    Ratings Received:
    +137 / 0 / -0
    Platformism is still alive...they just be concealin' it. :)
  5. NUFO06 Member

    Member Since:
    Aug 15, 2006
    Message Count:
    82
    Ratings Received:
    +16 / 0 / -0
    Find out how many in your class want P-3s and then see where you fallout NSS wise. We had 4 who wanted with 2 slots available. The other guy who got it was a prior non-acoustic and he was thrilled to death. I have heard of people mostly for E-6s, but for P-3s too being held back or leaped up a class to get a spot. Good luck and dont quit if you dont get P-3s, I hear low levels are amazing in the T-6.
  6. OUSOONER O-4 Line of sight tasking is real...

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2008
    Message Count:
    1,428
    Ratings Received:
    +272 / 0 / -0
    It really is still about what percent gets jets....they are just getting more clever by asking what percent get helo's/p-3's and work backward from there. They are self-aware! They're learning!

    Standby for "What percent out of multi-engine go P-3's or P-8's? I want P-8's but don't want P-3's." It's coming..
    • Contributor

    helolumpy Anyone got a spare runway?

    Member Since:
    Oct 3, 2006
    Message Count:
    1,827
    Ratings Received:
    +865 / 0 / -0
    It's a 50% chance of getting P-3's. Either you do or you don't.

    Next question please....
  7. scoolbubba Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 4, 2007
    Message Count:
    3,540
    Ratings Received:
    +1,644 / 1 / -2
    I don't want P-8s but I don't want P-3s, what are your advices?!?

    ...anyone got the number for truckmasters? I hear they have flying orders...
    • Like Like x 1
    • Contributor

    Recovering LSO Suck Less

    Member Since:
    Feb 20, 2007
    Message Count:
    1,544
    Ratings Received:
    +918 / 0 / -1
    alright, since there seem to be a bunch of P-3 dudes watching this thread devolve, it seems like as a good of a place as any to ask this question:

    WHY, WHY, WHY for the love of all that is good do P-3 guys call for a full stop just to wave it off IM "for training". Please, for the sake of other folks in tower's airspace call for the option, or full stop when you say you're gonna full stop. Looking at you Marlin 51.....//end rant//
  8. OUSOONER O-4 Line of sight tasking is real...

    Member Since:
    Feb 13, 2008
    Message Count:
    1,428
    Ratings Received:
    +272 / 0 / -0
    Here in Jax it is just playing the game.. We are supposed to "think" we are going to land with a simulated 3 or 2 engine only to be told to wave off at the last min by the IP.

    I guess knowing it is coming (which we really do) is counter to training?! USUALLY, IP's know this and ask for the option but some ask for full stop.
    • Contributor

    PropAddict Now with even more awesome!

    Member Since:
    May 3, 2008
    Message Count:
    1,308
    Ratings Received:
    +366 / 0 / -0
    For engine out and no flap "funny landings," we have to full stop it. It's part of our emergency landing brief to "make sure tower knows this will be a full stop," so a lot of studs will call for it or instructors will play the student's game and call for it when directed.

    The bitch of it is that there are also a crap ton of other items that must be briefed verbatim from NATOPS before you can let the stud touch down. A lot of studs will rush through and try to get it all briefed, even inside the 180, and end up waving off when they can't get it done.

    Sometimes, though, we just need to see a waveoff from the student.
    • Contributor

    Recovering LSO Suck Less

    Member Since:
    Feb 20, 2007
    Message Count:
    1,544
    Ratings Received:
    +918 / 0 / -1
    so just call for the option....?
    • Like Like x 2
  9. MasterBates Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    May 31, 2006
    Message Count:
    9,762
    Ratings Received:
    +1,772 / 0 / -2
    Granted, I had 2 less engines, but DAMN you guys over geek that.
    • Like Like x 1
    • Super Moderator
    • Contributor

    Brett327 Magnum!

    Member Since:
    Dec 23, 2004
    Message Count:
    9,252
    Ratings Received:
    +2,640 / 3 / -7
    It's what they do. The VP guys have a long sordid history of non-standard operations, radio verbosity (when they're on UHF) and otherwise going out of their way to make life difficult for themselves and everyone trying to operate in a given Class C. Nobody on ground ever will care (or have the knowledges or authority) to grant them permission to start their engines, etc, etc, etc, but that won't stop them from following their VP-30 script to the letter.

    It's what they do. :D

    Brett
  10. C420sailor Rhino Bro

    Member Since:
    Nov 23, 2007
    Message Count:
    1,430
    Ratings Received:
    +354 / 1 / -1
    I'm pretty damn gullible, so I'm going to bite off on this one.

    Really?
    • Contributor

    PropAddict Now with even more awesome!

    Member Since:
    May 3, 2008
    Message Count:
    1,308
    Ratings Received:
    +366 / 0 / -0
    <Sigh> . . .yeah, totally.

    A glimmer of hope: when I went through the Fleet IUT, the 30 guys made a point of showing how everyone in the room could quote the precise amount of hyd fluid that can leak out of the brake fuses before they seal themselves off, but nobody could identify threat ranges of common SAMs or release envelopes for SLAM-ER.

    It was kind of a cool, mea culpa, "we know we taught you to do this, but you kinda went overboard with it. . .and we need you to stop."

    (And, FTR, some of us always ask for the option.)
    • Like Like x 2
    • Contributor

    PropAddict Now with even more awesome!

    Member Since:
    May 3, 2008
    Message Count:
    1,308
    Ratings Received:
    +366 / 0 / -0
    Brett is used to operating at Navy fields, where nobody cares who starts motors where. P-3's fly out of international airports on the reg, where ground is choreographing everything like a Boeing ballet. You WILL get your nuts hammered if you just push back and spin up motors without telling anyone.

    I suppose we do it everywhere else so that it just becomes habit and we never forget. (yeah, I know. . .)
    • Contributor

    BACONATOR Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    May 2, 2007
    Message Count:
    3,824
    Ratings Received:
    +535 / 5 / -0
    Also, for helos, it's standard practice at AFB fields to request engine start/rotor engagement. But at NAS or MCAS airfields, they don't give a shit and will quizzically reply in the affirmative if you ask. I've had HAC/CPs "correct" me for not asking at a non AF field, because they didn't realize that it's just a homefield ops idiosyncrasy of the AF and the Navy and MC don't give a shit.
  11. 81montedriver Third ball removed

    Member Since:
    Dec 20, 2009
    Message Count:
    347
    Ratings Received:
    +66 / 0 / -0
    Why not just hold somewhere until all NATOPS items are cleaned up/briefed and once ready to land you exit holding?
    • Like Like x 1

Share This Page