Another nail in the coffin of Old-School Naval Avaition..

Discussion in 'Miscellaneous' started by MasterBates, Jan 26, 2011.

    • Contributor

    Flash SEVAL/ECMO

    Member Since:
    Oct 10, 2003
    Message Count:
    4,541
    Ratings Received:
    +1,082 / 1 / -11
    It was unofficially condoned by many commands in DC including the Joint Staff (the folks in 'joint' commands were able to get away with it a lot easier) until a SWO Director of Navy Staff put a stop to it in 2008 or so. There are still a few that may wear their bags but it is rare. I wonder if that changes with this new rule though, a lot of folks wear aquaflage to work in DC (not sure about the Pentagon), they may put out more restrictive regs for DC as they have in the past.
  1. SC-NY-88 SNFO

    Member Since:
    Jul 22, 2010
    Message Count:
    122
    Ratings Received:
    +3 / 0 / -0
    "(D) OUTER WEAR: BROWN LEATHER JACKET. GREEN NOMEX JACKETS ARE
    ONLY AUHTORIZED ON BASE AND AFLOAT"

    Why is the leather jacket even mentioned? Just as a statement? The brown leather jacket IS outer wear?
    Lucky me, I get to create a PPt. for the wing on the changes!(Voluntold)
    • Super Moderator
    • Contributor

    Brett327 Magnum!

    Member Since:
    Dec 23, 2004
    Message Count:
    9,253
    Ratings Received:
    +2,640 / 3 / -7
    You have to know how to read these messages. Under the sub paragraph "manner of wear," it's telling you what is authorized as "outerwear" (brown leather jacket). It then specifies the more restrictive situations when Nomex is and is not authorized. Make sense?
  2. SC-NY-88 SNFO

    Member Since:
    Jul 22, 2010
    Message Count:
    122
    Ratings Received:
    +3 / 0 / -0
    Yes sir, thank you.
    Also, FWIW, its nice that tan is authorized again, but we don't get issued them anymore. I received 4 sage green, as did most all of us youngins (on the Navy side).
  3. Renegade One Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 9, 2007
    Message Count:
    2,174
    Ratings Received:
    +1,341 / 1 / -7
    Man, I'm with you. I was hoping that during the CONA year, they might have allowed AWGs "with ribbons" (as in the VERY old days...) as a sort of beta-test. But, they didn't, and I frankly think AWGs have been relegated to the dust bin of Naval Aviation history. Hard to imagine that any future CNO would have it on his list of "things to do" to bring back an aviation-only uniform, no matter how classy it was.
    OBTW...because I don't think I ever said it before...MasterBates tried to do it the right way...penned a very well-researched and clearly articulated point paper/request "From the Fleet" on the whole AWGs thing. Got it routed, and supported, up to a pretty high step on the chain of command. Nice work, MB! Sorry it didn't pan out as you intended, but you fought a damned good fight. I, for one, wish you were still in uniform. If only so that "the system" could continue to kick you in the balls. :D
    I'm putting my money on the "MB for SECNAV" line...
    • Like Like x 1
  4. blackbart22 Active Member

    Member Since:
    Jan 9, 2007
    Message Count:
    198
    Ratings Received:
    +116 / 0 / -0
    Bought my first set of Greens with a "dead horse" in '60, but never saw any worn with ribbons, just wings. We did have a dentist on the Number Ten boat that wore them. He had to have the sleeve insignia made at the Diamond patch co in Yoko though.
  5. C420sailor Rhino Bro

    Member Since:
    Nov 23, 2007
    Message Count:
    1,430
    Ratings Received:
    +354 / 1 / -1
    Sounds to me like we need to get our hands on some tan nomex jackets...
    • Like Like x 6
    • Contributor

    zipmartin Why do I keep getting messages from Hoveround?

    Member Since:
    Nov 1, 2007
    Message Count:
    296
    Ratings Received:
    +286 / 0 / -0
    A funny story from the old days regarding wearing flight jackets off-base: Wearing the jackets was verboten; so much so that at one time in the late 70's at Cecil Field, a separate jacket spotting gate guard was stationed at the front gate whose sole purpose was to catch perpetrators in the act of trying to sneak through wearing their jackets on cold mornings. Driving down 103rd Street in the morning, approaching the gate, it was common to see cars weaving back and forth as pilots were removing their jackets as they drove. One morning there appeared alongside the road, about a quarter mile from the front gate, a professionally painted and constructed sign about the size of a 4x8 sheet of plywood that read, "CAUTION: FLIGHT JACKET REMOVAL AREA". Sadly, it lasted less than a day....and no one ever found out who was responsible for erecting it. But it was classic.
    • Like Like x 7
  6. RotorHead04 Patch Mafia

    Member Since:
    Feb 16, 2008
    Message Count:
    188
    Ratings Received:
    +60 / 0 / -0
    I stumbled into one at a squadron sponsored aviator Christmas. It seems an SKC had been stockpiling and the Wing was on the hunt for PreX of any kind. Funny how everyone magically was able to find enough flightsuits, etc. Of course, my rare find was a small pile of Summer Weight Tan Nomex.
  7. C420sailor Rhino Bro

    Member Since:
    Nov 23, 2007
    Message Count:
    1,430
    Ratings Received:
    +354 / 1 / -1
    I think I may be able to get my hands on one. I have some time though...at least fifty days before I can start sticking it to the man?
  8. MasterBates Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    May 31, 2006
    Message Count:
    9,762
    Ratings Received:
    +1,772 / 0 / -2
    Somebody needs to make me SECNAV. Who is in contention for President or at least Senator with influence before I am too old to get my own private COD?
    • Like Like x 1
    • Contributor

    Uncle Fester Big veiny triumphant bastard

    Member Since:
    Oct 7, 2007
    Message Count:
    2,448
    Ratings Received:
    +834 / 0 / -0
  9. MasterBates Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    May 31, 2006
    Message Count:
    9,762
    Ratings Received:
    +1,772 / 0 / -2
    Because I know how to fly a COD.
    • Super Moderator
    • Contributor

    ea6bflyr Working Class Bum

    Member Since:
    Nov 27, 2002
    Message Count:
    2,812
    Ratings Received:
    +571 / 0 / -0
    Meh, it's all asymetric thrust.

    -ea6bflyr ;)
  10. Renegade One Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 9, 2007
    Message Count:
    2,174
    Ratings Received:
    +1,341 / 1 / -7
    Scored as a "Shack". Check switches safe...cleared to RTB.
  11. Renegade One Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 9, 2007
    Message Count:
    2,174
    Ratings Received:
    +1,341 / 1 / -7
    Probably the best reason I've ever heard for an addition to the "Executive Airlift Squadron"...or whatever the hell it's called at Andrews...
    • Like Like x 1
  12. Renegade One Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 9, 2007
    Message Count:
    2,174
    Ratings Received:
    +1,341 / 1 / -7
    Miramar was worse. Someone before me in this thread has made mention of the "uniquely challenging days" at "Fightertown USA" under the command of a certain COMFITAEWWINGPAC who's "JOPA Callsign" was "Field Day". 'Nuff said...
    One of my most enduring memories of that time is coming to work through the North Gate off of Miramar Road...in a drenching rain...and seeing the CO of another squadron co-located in our same hangar...soaked to the skin in his khaki windbreaker (allowable outerwear...and those sucked major, by the way...) helping the Marine on the gate check that no criminals were coming through in flight jackets or flight suits. Rule was...if your JO was the last guy caught...you had the duty until you caught someone else's JO. I hope to hell there was some meeting of the Skippers where they all agreed to a "watch bill" wherein every squadron would rotate a sacrificial lamb JO through the gate just to share the pain. Don't know that was the case...but would have been HAPPY to have taken one for the team if it was...
    Ah...the things we do for Naval Aviation. Don't even get me going on "Bird Watch" Duty...same COMFIT...same timeframe...same madness. We chuckle about it now...
    • Super Moderator
    • Contributor

    Brett327 Magnum!

    Member Since:
    Dec 23, 2004
    Message Count:
    9,253
    Ratings Received:
    +2,640 / 3 / -7
    Ahh the good old days, when all was right with the world. :D You guys still want to go back to the way it was? ;)
  13. HAL Pilot Thanks

    Member Since:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Message Count:
    4,477
    Ratings Received:
    +2,497 / 2 / -0
    There might have been some BS rules, but the punishments weren't much and they definitely were not the career-enders they are today.
    • Like Like x 1
  14. Renegade One Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 9, 2007
    Message Count:
    2,174
    Ratings Received:
    +1,341 / 1 / -7
    Well, I think THAT part is true...for sure.
    • Like Like x 1
    • Super Moderator
    • Contributor

    Brett327 Magnum!

    Member Since:
    Dec 23, 2004
    Message Count:
    9,253
    Ratings Received:
    +2,640 / 3 / -7
    I don't think anyone's career is going down the tubes for wearing the wrong jacket - even today. ;)
    • Contributor

    helolumpy Anyone got a spare runway?

    Member Since:
    Oct 3, 2006
    Message Count:
    1,829
    Ratings Received:
    +865 / 0 / -0
    I was at Shaw AFB in S. Carolina and a similar rule was applicable to the "Days Since Last DUI" counter at the main gate.
    If you got caught for a DUI, you were responsible to go out the main gate every morning at 0630 and change the number. You had that duty until someone else got bagged, and then they had the responsibility to change the number to "1" the next morning.
    It was actually a pretty effective tool since it was visible to the rest of the junior folks of the hazards of drinking and driving.
    • Contributor

    bert Trying out the real world

    Member Since:
    Feb 12, 2007
    Message Count:
    1,010
    Ratings Received:
    +357 / 0 / -0
    Did they wait for somebody to be convicted or was an arrest enough?
    • Contributor

    helolumpy Anyone got a spare runway?

    Member Since:
    Oct 3, 2006
    Message Count:
    1,829
    Ratings Received:
    +865 / 0 / -0
    I never asked that question. The way it was explained was the person who has to change the number was the last person "who had a DUI".
  15. magnetfreezer Active Member

    Member Since:
    May 21, 2007
    Message Count:
    273
    Ratings Received:
    +47 / 0 / -0
    Generally they will punish without regard to the status of civilian courts. Know a number of troops doing the park at gate DUI lot/walk of shame or catch a ride since they're still serving their 1 year on base driving suspension even w/charges dropped.

Share This Page